You are viewing [info]rosamicula's journal

Previous Entry | Next Entry

weight a minute

  • Jul. 20th, 2006 at 1:16 PM
Beardsley Hangman
Someone on my f-list recently made a post expressing his horror and dismay at pro-anorexia sites like this one. I share his revulsion for the 'nothing tastes as good as thin feels.... Mary-Kate Olsen is my thinspiration... I must get my weight in pounds down to double digits before spring break' mindset. I think most people are repulsed and saddened by it. Recently, when a clearly anorexic girl posted pictures of herself on a (pics of naked women) community I'm involvd in, a number of people commented voicing their concerns about her health or linking to sites where she could get help for her condition etc.

But when a clearly morbidly obese woman posted pictures of herself some of the same commentators exclaimed that her curves were cute and applauded her declaration that she felt really good about herself. Given that she was so obese she needed to use a ventilator at night I was stunned by their response. I suspect I am in the minority because I find sites like this one just as disturbing as the pro-ana sites, and found the obese woman's claim to beauty as warped and spurious as those who starve themselves. Both groups are placing serious and widely documented (though very different) strains on their health and boths groups make the 'this isn't a disease, it's a lifestyle choice' claim.

It's a view I've encountered professionally. I have taught in colleges and unis where staff have had special directives about spotting students who may be suffering from eating disorders and referring them to the support services within the institution. My suggestion that I refer a boy who was chronically obese for similar support was rejected as insensitive, even though special chairs had to be purchased for him because he couldn't fit in the normal ones. Far more of us overeat than undereat, of course, so there is far less of a stigma (or perhaps a different kind of stigma) to being overweight than underweight.

It is the double standard that I find troubling; surely if a morbidly obese woman can be congratulated for loving herself as she is and not wanting to change, one who is delighted with her own skeletal appearance deserves the same acceptance?

Comments

( 87 comments — Leave a comment )
[info]steer wrote:
Jul. 20th, 2006 12:17 pm (UTC)
It's a question of balance isn't it -- the majority of society has the firmly entrenched values "unhealthily thin == beautiful and sexy" and "unhealthily fat == lazy and ugly".

So in most situations the unhealthily thin person will be praised for her looks encouraging the self-destructive behaviour. On the other hand, someone who is unhealthily fat will be less often be praised for their looks and more often be insulted.

The problem is that you are looking at a very biased sample set. Those people who are concerned about eating disorders -- therefore you will be reading stuff by people who do reverse societal norms about what is a normal/healthy body shape.

However, there is also the issue "what is actually good for the person?"

I generalise wildly here but my experience of anorexics is that they WANT to be noticed for it. (Insensitive people call it attention seeking which kind of misses the point in my opinion). If that attention is not provided their behaviour becomes more extreme. On the other hand, people who are chronically overweight generally speaking do NOT want to be noticed for it -- indeed would shy away from such notice. I am sure that there are specific cases where the opposite is true obviously people being what they are -- difficult.

However, generally speaking, I don't see anything that wrong with the idea of telling someone overweight that they look fine (assuming they do) but that that it would be a good idea for them to lose weight for health reasons.

People do have some rather wild reactions to all these things of course. Callista Flockheart was widely criticised for becoming very thin to play a role which was of someone very thin. At the same time, Tom Hanks was widely praised for becoming quite fat then very thin to play the role of someone who lost weight (Castaway I think it was) and Robert De Niro was widely praised for similar devotion to acting.

I guess that castigating a society which encourages only the "very thin" look as attractive can spill over into criticising the person themselves.

However, I think that it's very important to remember that in asking "if a morbidly obese woman can be congratulated for loving herself as she is and not wanting to change, one who is delighted with her own skeletal appearance deserves the same acceptance?" you are totally reversing the normal way round that people experience these things.

In society as a whole the thin person is much more likely to be praised for their looks the fat person more likely to be abused for the same.
[info]steer wrote:
Jul. 20th, 2006 12:39 pm (UTC)
To put it more simply:

A person who is unhealthily fat does not (in general) need to be told they are unhealthily fat -- society tells them this in no uncertain terms. They may choose to ignore it but they will have constant reminders from society.

A person who is unhealthily thin (who is annorexic) knows intellectually that they are unhealthily thin but does not realise this emotionally and indeed often believe they are too fat. Society often encourages them to remain as thin or thinner.
(no subject) - [info]steer - Jul. 20th, 2006 01:12 pm (UTC) - Expand
[info]dryad_wombat wrote:
Jul. 20th, 2006 01:37 pm (UTC)
On the other hand, someone who is unhealthily fat will be less often be praised for their looks and more often be insulted.

Are you totally sure about this being true these days? Until I'd read Rosa's post and thought about it, I would have thought the same as you about this. But ROsa's post is spot on. I've never seen someone criticised for this, but I have seen (and received!) criticism for being too thin (at size 10, no less, which is hardly emaciated).

I think [info]rosamicula is spot on, though I hadn't noticed this weird phenomenon properly until I read her post.
(no subject) - [info]steer - Jul. 20th, 2006 01:52 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]inbetween_girl - Jul. 20th, 2006 05:44 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]rosamicula - Jul. 20th, 2006 07:42 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]rosamicula - Jul. 20th, 2006 07:55 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]hiromasaki - Jul. 20th, 2006 01:47 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]failing_angel - Jul. 20th, 2006 02:01 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]ivory_goddess - Jul. 20th, 2006 02:53 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]failing_angel - Jul. 20th, 2006 03:03 pm (UTC) - Expand
[info]failing_angel wrote:
Jul. 20th, 2006 12:20 pm (UTC)
Yikes.

This sounds akin to the classic 'PC' conventions (he says using the terms incredibly loosely) that are overly prevalent in our society.

If you're emaciated and starving yourself, you're obviously brainwashed by the Patriarchal archetype of what womanhood is supposed to be = victim.
Therefore anything (for example obesity) that opposes that = a valiant stand against conformity.

I suppose that outside of the small fraction of obese people who have a compulsion to overeat, the majority are due to their lifestyle of poor food and lack of exercise (*cough, cough, ahem*).

I guess actually, that's the one thing that the pro-ana group has going for it - they're so much easier to sit beside on the bus - no seat & half to 2 seats being used by one person here. (Plus none of that horrid stale sweat aroma - even in mid-winter).
[info]failing_angel wrote:
Jul. 20th, 2006 12:24 pm (UTC)
Just looked at that 'Ana-angels' horror.

"for one cant be helped until they want help"
Aside from the grammar - what an interesting way of stating that one abstains from responsibility - "sorry guv'nor - I wish I could help, but that guy lying on the ground with a smashed skull isn't asking for help."

Gah!!
(no subject) - [info]steer - Jul. 20th, 2006 12:39 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]failing_angel - Jul. 20th, 2006 12:42 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]steer - Jul. 20th, 2006 12:45 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]failing_angel - Jul. 20th, 2006 12:57 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]steer - Jul. 20th, 2006 01:03 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]failing_angel - Jul. 20th, 2006 01:29 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]steer - Jul. 20th, 2006 01:34 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]failing_angel - Jul. 20th, 2006 01:37 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]steer - Jul. 20th, 2006 01:54 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]failing_angel - Jul. 20th, 2006 02:04 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]steer - Jul. 20th, 2006 02:05 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]failing_angel - Jul. 20th, 2006 02:11 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]failing_angel - Jul. 20th, 2006 02:05 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]silenttex - Jul. 20th, 2006 02:31 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]moral_vacuum - Jul. 20th, 2006 04:42 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]silenttex - Jul. 21st, 2006 09:25 am (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]silenttex - Jul. 20th, 2006 01:40 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]steer - Jul. 20th, 2006 01:59 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]silenttex - Jul. 20th, 2006 02:26 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]steer - Jul. 20th, 2006 02:32 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]silenttex - Jul. 20th, 2006 02:49 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]steer - Jul. 20th, 2006 02:51 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]silenttex - Jul. 20th, 2006 03:06 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]steer - Jul. 20th, 2006 03:10 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]cookwitch - Jul. 20th, 2006 04:25 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]silenttex - Jul. 21st, 2006 09:13 am (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]steer - Jul. 21st, 2006 11:18 am (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]silenttex - Jul. 21st, 2006 12:03 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]steer - Jul. 21st, 2006 12:04 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]silenttex - Jul. 21st, 2006 12:53 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]cookwitch - Jul. 20th, 2006 04:22 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]steer - Jul. 20th, 2006 06:09 pm (UTC) - Expand
[info]cookwitch wrote:
Jul. 20th, 2006 12:22 pm (UTC)
There is, indeed, a double standard. Eating onself into an ealry grave is as sad as starving oneself into it. An eating disorder is an eating disorder, whether you're fat or thin, that makes no difference.

I look back at photos of myself at 19 stone and think ugh. I can never be 'proud' of that type of body. That isn't Goddess-like, as far as I'm concered, that's obese and unattractively so. It's a body that I'd let go, and not cared about enough to fix. From my own personal point of view, there was a weight that I reached when I felt comfortable that I was doing enough to keep healthy, if not to be as slim as I was 'meant to be'.

When I see girls far larger than I am, wheezing and in pain from their aching joints and backs bowed by their breasts, it hurts ME. To tell them to be proud of their weight and to glorify in it? No. Self loathing is also not to be encouraged but when you help someone to glorify and treat what is killing them as a fabulous thing? No way.

"Oh look at me I'm fat and beautiful!" Well yes, you are dear but your knees are crumbling and your spine is about to break. Not to metion all the sore places and the breathlessness.

I should stop. Oh dear.
[info]zapruder wrote:
Jul. 20th, 2006 12:30 pm (UTC)
I think that eating disorders where the sufferer is thin tend to be seen as needing care, understanding, therapy, being seated in emotional trauma etc. Because fat people are seen as being comical or viewed with disdain, being very obese is usually seen as being a choice or active decision on the part of the obese person - laziness, greed, stupidity are all associated with being obese.

'Love your curves' when related to vast heaving rolls of fat is just an attempt to sound with it and non-judgemental anyway.
[info]cookwitch wrote:
Jul. 20th, 2006 12:51 pm (UTC)
being very obese is usually seen as being a choice or active decision on the part of the obese person - laziness, greed, stupidity are all associated with being obese.

Yes. Try to even suggest an illness or an eating disorder and you get laughed at.
[info]mr_tom wrote:
Jul. 20th, 2006 12:58 pm (UTC)
So on average, all's well in the world!
[info]silenttex wrote:
Jul. 20th, 2006 01:19 pm (UTC)
It's to do with society's perception. Anorexia is percieved as disease, with both physical and mental effects, making the sufferer a victim that requires treatment and understanding. Obesity, by contrast, is perceived as self induced through gluttony, sloth and a lack of self control. It doesn't matter that over-eating may be a symptom of an underlying mental or emotional problem.
Put more simply, the ignorant masses that make up the general public can readily identify sympathetically with the concept of an anorexic, after all, everyone has experienced not wanting to eat at some point, and it's easy to extrapolate that into "imagine feeling like that all the time", which I suspect is the way said masses think anorexia feels like.
By the same token, almost everyone has experience of exercising self control over what they eat, so an attitude of "and if I can do it, so can they" pervades, regardless of the actual cause of the problem.
[info]steer wrote:
Jul. 20th, 2006 01:35 pm (UTC)
But in fact surely it is the case that anorexia IS a disease and obesity isn't?
(no subject) - [info]dryad_wombat - Jul. 20th, 2006 01:41 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]steer - Jul. 20th, 2006 01:56 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]rosamicula - Jul. 20th, 2006 02:32 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]steer - Jul. 20th, 2006 02:40 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]rosamicula - Jul. 20th, 2006 02:51 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]steer - Jul. 20th, 2006 02:52 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]lilitufire - Jul. 21st, 2006 02:05 am (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]rosamicula - Jul. 21st, 2006 08:20 am (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]silenttex - Jul. 20th, 2006 02:42 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]silenttex - Jul. 20th, 2006 01:52 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]steer - Jul. 20th, 2006 01:55 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]silenttex - Jul. 20th, 2006 02:12 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]steer - Jul. 20th, 2006 02:15 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]silenttex - Jul. 20th, 2006 02:39 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]steer - Jul. 20th, 2006 02:41 pm (UTC) - Expand
[info]cryx wrote:
Jul. 20th, 2006 01:58 pm (UTC)
i completely agree.
[info]speedmetalsteve wrote:
Jul. 20th, 2006 02:43 pm (UTC)
The whole thing bothers me. I'd try to explain my precise stance in an eloquent and concise manner, but I'd get too annoyed and might end up bursting my spleen again.

I will say, however, that every time I pay a woman a compliment regarding their appearance and they reply with "oh no, I'm fat/skinny/short/lanky/ugly etc." a little piece of me bangs its head against a wall until it dies. As a rule of thumb, women are easy on the eye. Unless they look like John Prescott, have facial necrosis, or are Paris "I survived ten years in a Japanese concentration camp and all I got was this stupid face" Hilton.
[info]elsabeta wrote:
Jul. 20th, 2006 04:13 pm (UTC)
I rather like that: "As a rule of thumb, women are easy on the eye." May I quote that (with proper attribution, of course)?
(no subject) - [info]speedmetalsteve - Jul. 20th, 2006 06:12 pm (UTC) - Expand
[info]moral_vacuum wrote:
Jul. 20th, 2006 04:54 pm (UTC)
1) Love your curves" does not mean "love your life-threatening obesity that means you can hardly walk unaided".

2) When Dawn French said "Fat women are sexy" she was talking crap. As much crap as someone saying "thin women are sexy". There are people attracted to particular body shapes, there are cultural "norms" about what body shape is meant to be attractive, but SEXINESS IS ABOUT THE PERSON. Hattie Jacques was damned sexy, but then so is Kristin Scott Thomas. Pauline Quirke is not sexy, but then neither is Renee Zellweger.

3) many of the girls on these "Pro Ana" websites aren't anorexic. If they were they wouldn't look at themselves and see thinness and want to be even thinner, they would look at their skeletal frame and see fatness (as far as I'm aware). In a lot of these cases it seems to be less of an eating disorder, and more body dysmorphia.
[info]inbetween_girl wrote:
Jul. 20th, 2006 05:48 pm (UTC)
When Dawn French said "Fat women are sexy" she was talking crap. As much crap as someone saying "thin women are sexy". There are people attracted to particular body shapes, there are cultural "norms" about what body shape is meant to be attractive, but SEXINESS IS ABOUT THE PERSON. Hattie Jacques was damned sexy, but then so is Kristin Scott Thomas. Pauline Quirke is not sexy, but then neither is Renee Zellweger.

We have just cleared this one up 'somewhere else'. Vanessa Feltz, for example, mings just as much as a size 24 as she did as a size 12, as she did as a size 24 before that.
(no subject) - [info]lilitufire - Jul. 21st, 2006 02:07 am (UTC) - Expand
[info]zoo_music_girl wrote:
Jul. 20th, 2006 05:30 pm (UTC)
Well said. I used to be very underweight (7 stone 6 at 5 foot 9. I didn't have any eating disorders and didn't want to be that skinny, that's just the way I was.) It was somehow ok for people to make comments who would never have dreamed of commenting on a larger person's size.
[info]inbetween_girl wrote:
Jul. 20th, 2006 05:49 pm (UTC)
I didn't realise this debate was raging here as well. I feel rather late to the party!
[info]rosamicula wrote:
Jul. 20th, 2006 07:43 pm (UTC)
Gah! I meant to put 'crossposted elsewhere' at the end of both, but was confused by posting it twice.
[info]puritypersimmon wrote:
Jul. 20th, 2006 06:39 pm (UTC)
I agree with you (and many of the comments too) - society does display annoying double standards on the issue. It's an area where I also find myself in strident disagreement with certain feminists. "Fat Is A Feminist Issue" has a lot to answer for. Surely thin is an equally pressing feminist issue. Whilst completely understanding that many anorexics and morbidly obese women owe their condition to psychological or physiological problems, many more at the less severe end of the spectrum are reacting to cultural norms/expectations. They starve themselves in an attempt to attain the "lollipop lady" attributes the media peddles as desirable, or they stuff themselves and are persuaded that this is somehow empowering and fighting stereotypes. Both are, of course, misguided, and demonstrate how damaging the continuing objectification of women can be - and how apparently PC attitudes can exacerbate the problem. In less superficial and decadent societies, of course, we wouldn't even be discussing this...

I realise that your point applies to both genders, and hope I've not gone into feminist rant mode. It's just that the majority of the censure does seem to be directed at women in particular (although sadly, equality in this instance appears to involve more men suffering the same kind of problems with body image).
[info]rosamicula wrote:
Jul. 20th, 2006 07:44 pm (UTC)
Beautifully put. I couldn't agree more.
(no subject) - [info]puritypersimmon - Jul. 21st, 2006 08:50 am (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]moral_vacuum - Jul. 20th, 2006 10:32 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]puritypersimmon - Jul. 21st, 2006 08:49 am (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - [info]lilitufire - Jul. 21st, 2006 02:09 am (UTC) - Expand
[info]monkeydoodle wrote:
Jul. 21st, 2006 04:05 am (UTC)
[info]rosamicula wrote:
Jul. 21st, 2006 08:16 am (UTC)
Oh God - I saw a documentary on these guys a while ago - singularly scary. I think it's a penis substitute - 'my weener is tiny but hell, you should see the size of my wife's flab'.
[info]speedmetalsteve wrote:
Jul. 22nd, 2006 09:41 pm (UTC)
I just clicked the first link, and I think we need to create a kind of nerve gas that only kills skinny idiots. I realise this isn't in keeping with the mature discussion of the other eighty-odd replies, but as far as I'm concerned, any debate that can't be settled with nerve gas isn't worth the effort.
[info]rosamicula wrote:
Jul. 23rd, 2006 12:31 am (UTC)
I've just been thinking about you.

I was watching a CLint Eastwood movie.

The Bridges of Madison County

I approve of nerve gas.
( 87 comments — Leave a comment )

Profile

Aubrey Beardsley Standard
[info]rosamicula
Rosamicula

Latest Month

April 2012
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow